Resilience is a widely accepted concept to which scholars and policymakers refer to address the complexity of urban systems. Many frameworks to measure urban resilience already exist. In this paper, the main urban resilience frameworks (i.e., City Resilience Index, Resilience Maturity Model, and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction) are analysed to shed light on the common dimensions they present. Additionally, the relationship between (i) resilience and (ii) sustainability and well-being in the urban context is investigated. To do so, Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, scaled at city level, and the Equitable and Sustainable Territorial well-being framework are compared with the urban resilience frameworks. In the urban domain, the concepts of resilience, sustainability and well-being partially overlap. Many dimensions (e.g., health, economic prosperity, environmental protection) are considered in the resilience as well as in sustainability and well-being frameworks. Such dimensions are indeed measured with the same or very similar metrics. However, an in-depth analysis of dimensions and indicators showed some interesting differences. The paper provides knowledge advancement on the topic of resilience in the urban context and highlights those aspects that policymakers should consider so as to pursue resilience as well as sustainability and well-being goals in the initiatives they implement to face emerging urban challenges.