Sometimes our best solutions come from looking at problems differently. Fresh perspectives can come from working with different partners. When developing strategy in what Vaill (1996) refers to as “permanent whitewater”, organization leaders need to go beyond a firm or industry centric approach and consider a broader, network based or ecosystem view. This paper examines a range of collaborative approaches to change – strategic alliances, public private partnerships, issues management alliances, innovation and enterprise zones, supply chain certification and partnerships, industry self- regulatory systems, and technology incubators – and suggests how these may be part of a bigger adaptation. Such new models may be critical in addressing bigger issues of immigration and workforce development, disruptive technologies, globalization, corruption, and climate change. The paper builds the case that these collaborative responses are not simply new forms, but represent a new logic and values (Austrom and Lad, 1989). They incorporate a “both and logic” and a more ecological perspective. They recognize that going it alone may not be sufficient. Partnering with NGOs, third party organizations and even government agencies may lead to better solutions. Finally, they see leadership in generating new conversations and asking different questions. Knowledge management in this turbulent environment moves from an intra- firm approach to an inter- organization eco-system way of thinking. The paper lays out a model of business government relations derived from Williamson (1996). It goes beyond the typical collaborations of trade associations, strategic alliances, and public private partnerships to include standards organizations such as ISO and LEAD, workforce development partnerships, and business incubators and enterprise zones. The paper provides 3 detailed cases that illustrate new forms of adaptation. These include: Recycling – a unique collaboration between government, business, and new NGOs; Industry self-regulation and standard groups – third party entities helping level the playing field and paving the way for market growth; Maker spaces and innovation centers – helping urban and regional economic development through workforce development. Three elements make this original. It lays out a discussion of the new logics and new values behind these new organization forms, it delineates a model of business, government and NGO interaction, and it offers 3 detailed case studies that represent archetypes of future forms. The paper provides a range of examples of cross organization collaboration that suggests a broader scope for knowledge management. It offers a set of considerations for boundary spanning beyond the firm such as social issues and stakeholder management public policy involvement, and issues management. It illustrates examples of social problem solving by firms that enhance business and the communities where they operate.