Problem solving is a transversal skill that transcends individual disciplines and explores the applicability of knowledge. The purpose of this study was to examine students’ learning behaviour in an interactive problem-solving environment by means of a logfile analysis, which provided both a qualitative and quantitative description of the exploration strategies students used in mapping minimally complex, simulated problems. We propose an approach which enables us to describe not only the quantitative change of students’ learning and exploration strategies in a simulated problem-solving environment, but also the qualitative change. The sample for the study was drawn from first-year university students (N=1729; Mean_age=19.58; SD_age=1.8). The MicroDYN approach was employed as a measurement device for creative problem solving (OECD, 2014), which is a specific form of problem solving in interactive situations involving minimal complex systems (Funke, 2014). The assessment took place in the ICT lab of the University of Szeged Library. The test took approximately 45 minutes to complete. The results shed new light and provide a new interpretation of previous analyses of creative problem solving in the MicroDYN approach, since the existing body of empirical research involved analyses of the second (describe) and the third (operate) phases. The true benefit of the latent profile analysis‐based approach is that it has confirmed our hypothesis that development can be described in terms of not only quantitative change, but also qualitative change. An exclusively quantitative analysis is insufficient, as it would lead to false conclusions in this case. There is great potential in investigating and clustering the problem-solving behaviour and exploration strategy usage of students to learn about their learning strategies in a creative and interactive problem-solving environment. This information has direct implications for teaching, especially for devising instructional methods for improving students’ higher-order reasoning skills and scientific inquiry (Kuhn, 2012).